explanations
f
the proposal that
the Government should
Sefray My part of
the
prammin's payable
by the two shroff
in ropect of
security
the
which
Governor.
No.
Lugard Conf.
1908
7th apl
Last previous Paper.
they
Gov.
have to give for
the proper Sischarge
б
their Sules
1036935
of
SONG KONG
Noo. 17083
(Subject.)
Supreme Court work.
21
DESPATCH,
¡Recs
CO
17083
13 MAY 08
Transmito copy corres with Cd.
and again submits for decision question of app!
a third Judge, or an appellate fudge saper legal opinion divided as to weessity for a third
M2 Stillo
No 755
not cox
(Minutes.)
Lixtrack to +J. Cams
253-12-1.
18 Sept
Trea
7,3538.
100004--- WY. & S. 1.3u,—9362—
1256102-W. a 9. } td.-2015- 250-11-07
Next subsequent Paper.
yo 27955
I Son't think that
anyone
can read these papers without
каб
coming
ما
the
conclusion that if
the Thief Justice were not Sir & Piggott
there would not be
skeleton of
a
the
eve
case for
AL
Judge, apart from the appeal
Court argument.
the
Whatever the merits of question, the lone of Sir 7 Piggott's letten & his speech
Secutedly
in
Coun
Champ
objectionable, and in
new of this what I remember
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.